![]() ![]() Single shade (and opacity) resin composites provide a very good esthetic result and thus making the restorative technique simple. Advantages to this option are their conservative approach since there is minimal or no tooth preparation needed, better adhesion of the composite luting agent to the fiber reinforced framework, good esthetics, adaptability of various shapes, reparability and the physiological strength of the glass fibers Fiber-reinforced composite FPD´s could be made directly or indirectly using an artificial plastic tooth, the avulsed tooth or by a direct composite resin build up. With today's esthetic composite resin and bonding techniques a fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) FPD is a good alternative. With the introduction of Zirconia as a restorative material the esthetic outcome can be greatly improved but the limiting factor would still be there, tooth reduction and cost. Also, esthetics could be compromised with inadequate gingival contours and a grayish color showing facially of the incisal third of the abutment teeth due to the cast-metal lingual retainers. ![]() These options are considered to be an invasive treatment in terms of tooth reduction. However, economic factors, occlusal disorders, lack of adequate bone support or excessive removal of healthy dental structure are some of the limiting factors in the indication of some the options.Ĭonventionally, metal alloy has been used as the material for the framework either via porcelain-fused-metal (PFM) or resin bonded (Maryland type) fixed partial denture. A number of restorative options have been recommended in such cl inical situations: implants, fixed metal ceramic or all ceramic prostheses and resin bonded fixed partial dentures (FPDs). ![]() Replacing a single missing tooth in the anterior area lost due to dental caries or trauma represents a challenge for the clinician. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |